chore(ci): remove get_release_id task #484
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "rel-flow"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Okay, I will analyze the provided Git diff and explain the proposed changes.
Overall Summary
The diff shows a commented-out job in the
.gitea/workflows/release.ymlfile. The jobget_release_idand its associated steps are being commented out. Also, theneedsattribute forcreate_dockerjob has been changed.Detailed Explanation
Commenting out the
get_release_idjob:The entire
get_release_idjob block is being commented out. This includes thename,runs-on,needs,outputs, andstepssections.The original
get_release_idjob was responsible for fetching the ID of the latest release using acurlcommand against the Gitea API. The outputreleaseidwas likely intended to be used by subsequent jobs. Commenting this out means this ID will no longer be available.Modifying the
needsattribute for thecreate_dockerjob:The
needsattribute of thecreate_dockerjob has been modified.The original
needs: taghas been changed toneeds: create_release. This means that thecreate_dockerjob will now only run after thecreate_releasejob has completed successfully, instead of after thetagjob.Impact and Potential Reasons
Removal of Release ID: By commenting out
get_release_id, any downstream jobs relying on thereleaseidoutput will likely break. The reason for removing this is not apparent from the diff, but it could be due to:Changing Dependency for Docker Image Creation: Changing the dependency of
create_dockertocreate_releasesuggests a change in the intended workflow. Previously, the Docker image creation was triggered by the creation of a tag. Now, it's triggered specifically by the creation of a release. This might be done to ensure that Docker images are only built and published when a formal release is made, rather than on every tag.It's important to examine the broader context of the pull request and any associated issues to understand the rationale behind these changes more fully.
Decision: Reject
Change Score: 2/10
You're commenting out the
get_release_idjob. This job seems important for fetching the release ID, which might be used in subsequent steps. Removing it without a clear explanation or alternative solution is risky. And you've changed the dependencies ofcreate_dockerfromtagtocreate_release, which could break the workflow ifcreate_releasedoesn't provide the necessary information forcreate_docker.I need to understand why you're removing the
get_release_idjob and how thecreate_dockerjob will function correctly without it. Please provide a detailed explanation of these changes and any necessary modifications to ensure the workflow still works as expected.