revert e6a196feb4
#25
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "luke-patch-1"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
revert chore(deps): update https://git.tainton.uk/actions/conventional-commits-check-action action to v1.3.0 (#23)
This PR contains the following updates:
v1.2.4->v1.3.0Release Notes
actions/conventional-commits-check-action (https://git.tainton.uk/actions/conventional-commits-check-action)
v1.3.0Compare Source
Features
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.
Reviewed-on: #23
Reviewed-by: Luke Tainton luke@tainton.uk
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] renovate-bot@git.tainton.uk
Co-committed-by: renovate[bot] renovate-bot@git.tainton.uk
e6a196feb4Decision: Reject
Change Score: 2/10
This change proposes downgrading the version of the
conventional-commits-check-actionused in the workflow. Downgrading actions is generally a bad idea unless there's a very specific and well-understood reason (e.g., a critical bug in the newer version that affects you, and that is not the case here). You're moving from v1.3.0 to v1.2.4, which likely includes bug fixes, improvements, and possibly even security patches that you would be missing out on. This is almost certainly not the right approach, and I strongly advise against it unless you have a concrete justification. Sticking to newer versions is almost always preferable, especially within the same major version, since you're likely to receive security patches and bug fixes.If there is a problem that v1.3.0 causes for you, you should detail it in the commit message and the review request, so that it can be evaluated.
I am rejecting this change.