[SECURITY] Update dependency urllib3 to v2.0.7 [SECURITY] #75

Merged

renovate[bot] merged 1 commits from renovate/pypi-urllib3-vulnerability into main 2023-10-18 13:05:18 +02:00

Conversation 1 Commits 1 Files Changed 1 +3 -3

renovate[bot] commented 2023-10-18 01:10:27 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Copy Link

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
urllib3 (changelog)	==2.0.6 -> ==2.0.7

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2023-45803

urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 303 "See Other" after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like POST) to GET as is required by HTTP RFCs. Although the behavior of removing the request body is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers.

From RFC 9110 Section 9.3.1:

A client SHOULD NOT generate content in a GET request unless it is made directly to an origin server that has previously indicated, in or out of band, that such a request has a purpose and will be adequately supported.

Affected usages

Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable.

Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability:

• If you're using urllib3 and submitting sensitive information in the HTTP request body (such as form data or JSON)
• The origin service is compromised and starts redirecting using 303 to a malicious peer or the redirected-to service becomes compromised.

Remediation

You can remediate this vulnerability with any of the following steps:

• Upgrade to a patched version of urllib3 (v1.26.18 or v2.0.7)
• Disable redirects for services that you aren't expecting to respond with redirects with redirects=False.
• Disable automatic redirects with redirects=False and handle 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body.

---

Release Notes

urllib3/urllib3 (urllib3)

v2.0.7

Compare Source

• Made body stripped from HTTP requests changing the request method to GET after HTTP 303 "See Other" redirect responses. (GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [urllib3](https://togithub.com/urllib3/urllib3) ([changelog](https://togithub.com/urllib3/urllib3/blob/main/CHANGES.rst)) | `==2.0.6` -> `==2.0.7` | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | --- > [!WARNING] > Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information. ### GitHub Vulnerability Alerts #### [CVE-2023-45803](https://togithub.com/urllib3/urllib3/security/advisories/GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4) urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 303 "See Other" after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like `POST`) to `GET` as is required by HTTP RFCs. Although the behavior of removing the request body is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers. From [RFC 9110 Section 9.3.1](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-get): > A client SHOULD NOT generate content in a GET request unless it is made directly to an origin server that has previously indicated, in or out of band, that such a request has a purpose and will be adequately supported. ## Affected usages Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable. Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability: * If you're using urllib3 and submitting sensitive information in the HTTP request body (such as form data or JSON) * The origin service is compromised and starts redirecting using 303 to a malicious peer or the redirected-to service becomes compromised. ## Remediation You can remediate this vulnerability with any of the following steps: * Upgrade to a patched version of urllib3 (v1.26.18 or v2.0.7) * Disable redirects for services that you aren't expecting to respond with redirects with `redirects=False`. * Disable automatic redirects with `redirects=False` and handle 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body. --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>urllib3/urllib3 (urllib3)</summary> ### [`v2.0.7`](https://togithub.com/urllib3/urllib3/releases/tag/2.0.7) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/urllib3/urllib3/compare/2.0.6...2.0.7) - Made body stripped from HTTP requests changing the request method to GET after HTTP 303 "See Other" redirect responses. (GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Mend Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View repository job log [here](https://developer.mend.io/github/luketainton/webexmemebot). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy4xOS4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzcuMTkuMiIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6Im1haW4ifQ==-->

luketainton (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-10-18 01:10:27 +02:00

sonarqubecloud[bot] commented 2023-10-18 01:11:30 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Copy Link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!&nbsp; &nbsp; [](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=luketainton_webexmemebot&pullRequest=75&metric=duplicated_lines_density&view=list) No Duplication information

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

No reviewers

luketainton

Labels

Clear labels   

blocked

  

bug

Something isn't working

  

dependencies

  

documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  

duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  

enhancement

New feature or request

  

good first issue

Good for newcomers

  

help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  

invalid

This doesn't seem right

  

linting

  

question

Further information is requested

  

security

  

type

bugfix

  

type

dependencies

  

type

feature

  

type

other

  

unit-tests

  

wontfix

This will not be worked on

No Label

blocked

bug

dependencies

documentation

duplicate

enhancement

good first issue

help wanted

invalid

linting

question

security

type

bugfix

type

dependencies

type

feature

type

other

unit-tests

wontfix

Milestone

Clear milestone

No items

No Milestone

Assignees

Clear assignees

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: public/webexmemebot#75

No description provided.